Julien ÉLIE
2013-12-19 13:30:57 UTC
Hi,
The documentation for AC_CHECK_TYPE gives the following example:
use AC_CHECK_TYPES together with
#ifndef HAVE_LOFF_T
typedef loff_t off_t;
#endif
* Shouldn't it be "typedef off_t loff_t;" instead?
* Wouldn't it also be better to mention the fact that AC_TYPE_OFF_T
should be called so as to define off_t, if need be?
The documentation for AC_CHECK_TYPE gives the following example:
use AC_CHECK_TYPES together with
#ifndef HAVE_LOFF_T
typedef loff_t off_t;
#endif
* Shouldn't it be "typedef off_t loff_t;" instead?
* Wouldn't it also be better to mention the fact that AC_TYPE_OFF_T
should be called so as to define off_t, if need be?
--
Julien ÉLIE
« Il y a trois façons de faire les choses : la bonne, la mauvaise,
et la mienne. »
Julien ÉLIE
« Il y a trois façons de faire les choses : la bonne, la mauvaise,
et la mienne. »